Filed: Sep. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 14, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARD CHEN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, as stated on the record at the status conference on August 30, 2017, that the time between August 30, 2017, and October 25, 2017, be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B). Excluding time until October 25, 2017, will allow defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparat
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARD CHEN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, as stated on the record at the status conference on August 30, 2017, that the time between August 30, 2017, and October 25, 2017, be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B). Excluding time until October 25, 2017, will allow defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparati..
More
STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EDWARD CHEN, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, as stated on the record at the status conference on August 30, 2017, that the time between August 30, 2017, and October 25, 2017, be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B). Excluding time until October 25, 2017, will allow defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
As explained on the record during the August 30, 2017 status conference, the Court finds that the exclusion of the period from August 30, 2017, to October 25, 2017, from the time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161, is warranted; that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in the prompt disposition of this criminal case; and that the failure to grant the requested exclusion of time would unreasonably deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and would result in a miscarriage of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
