Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Google Inc., 3:17-cv-01138-JST (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171003997 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY COURT DEADLINES OTHER THAN THOSE SET FORTH IN THE COURT'S SEPTEMBER 27, 2017 ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, and Civil Local Rule 7-12, and the Court's September 26, 2017 Order to Modify Case Deadlines (ECF No. 402), Plaintiff Eolas Technologies Incorporated ("Eolas") and Defendants Google Inc. ("Google"), Amazon.com, Inc. ("Amazon"), and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Walmart") (collectively, "Defendants"
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY COURT DEADLINES OTHER THAN THOSE SET FORTH IN THE COURT'S SEPTEMBER 27, 2017 ORDER

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, and Civil Local Rule 7-12, and the Court's September 26, 2017 Order to Modify Case Deadlines (ECF No. 402), Plaintiff Eolas Technologies Incorporated ("Eolas") and Defendants Google Inc. ("Google"), Amazon.com, Inc. ("Amazon"), and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Walmart") (collectively, "Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby submit the following Joint Stipulation, as follows:

WHEREAS, on September 26, 2017, the Court granted the parties' stipulation (ECF No. 402)1 to extend deadlines to provide the Court time to issue an order regarding how to proceed to resolve Amazon's pending Motion for Order to Show Cause Regarding McKool Smith's Violation of Prosecution Bar (the "Prosecution Bar Motion") (ECF No. 262), which stated that the parties shall meet and confer regarding case deadlines after the Court issues such order;

WHEREAS, on September 27, 2017, the Court entered an Order Re Alleged Prosecution Bar Violation (ECF No. 403) setting forth actions and deadlines over the next several months related to the Prosecution Bar Motion;

WHEREAS, on September 28, 2017, pursuant to the entered stipulation (ECF No. 402), the parties met and conferred regarding an appropriate revised schedule for case deadlines other than those set forth in the Court's September 27, 2017 Order (ECF No. 403);

WHEREAS, the parties agree that the best course of action at this time is to stay all case deadlines other than those listed in the Court's September 27, 2017 Order (ECF No. 403), pending resolution of the Prosecution Bar Motion including any briefing and/or hearing as described in paragraph 10 of that Order;

WHEREAS, the parties further believe that following the resolution of the Prosecution Bar Motion and subject to the Court's availability, a further Case Management Conference to evaluate and/or reset all other case deadlines would be appropriate;

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND THE PARTIES JOINTLY REQUEST that the Court stay all case deadlines, other than those listed in the Court's September 27, 2017 Order (ECF No. 403), and, after resolution of the Prosecution Bar Motion, set a date for a further Case Management Conference at the Court's convenience.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiff Eolas Technologies Incorporated and Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. ("Amazon"), Google Inc. ("Google"), and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Walmart") (collectively, "Defendants") have stipulated to stay all case deadlines, other than those listed in the Court's Order Re Alleged Prosecution Bar Violation (ECF No. 403), pending resolution of the Prosecution Bar Motion.

The parties' joint stipulation is GRANTED. All case deadlines other than those listed in the Court's Order Re Alleged Prosecution Bar Violation (ECF No. 403) are stayed pending resolution of the Prosecution Bar Motion. Once the Prosecution Bar Motion has been resolved, the Court will set a date for a further Case Management Conference.

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. ECF Nos. are to the docket of Case No. 3:17-cv-03022-JST unless otherwise stated.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer