JOINER v. CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 16-cv-05260-DMR. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171003a07
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Roger Joiner filed a motion for leave to file a first amended complaint on September 15, 2017. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), any brief in opposition to Plaintiff's motion was due on September 29, 2017, but no such opposition has been received. Defendant City and County of San Francisco is ordered to respond by October 6, 2017 and show cause for its failure to respond to the motion in accordance with Civil Local R
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Roger Joiner filed a motion for leave to file a first amended complaint on September 15, 2017. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), any brief in opposition to Plaintiff's motion was due on September 29, 2017, but no such opposition has been received. Defendant City and County of San Francisco is ordered to respond by October 6, 2017 and show cause for its failure to respond to the motion in accordance with Civil Local Ru..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Roger Joiner filed a motion for leave to file a first amended complaint on September 15, 2017. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), any brief in opposition to Plaintiff's motion was due on September 29, 2017, but no such opposition has been received. Defendant City and County of San Francisco is ordered to respond by October 6, 2017 and show cause for its failure to respond to the motion in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) or alternatively to file a statement of nonopposition to the motion as required by Civil Local Rule 7-3(b). This order to show cause does not constitute permission to file a late opposition. If Defendant does not respond by October 6, 2017, Plaintiff's motion may be granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
