Pro-Shore, LLC v. Dayton Superior Corporation, 3:17-cv-05295-EMC. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171101c00
Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DAYTON SUPERIOR CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY 14 DAYS EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Defendant Dayton Superior Corporation ("Dayton") and Plaintiff Pro-Shore, LLC ("Pro-Shore") (collectively, "the Parties") hereby stipulate to extend the due date for Dayton to answer or otherwise respond to Pro-Shore's Complaint. Dayton's response is currently due on November 5, 2017. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-1, the parties, through their re
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DAYTON SUPERIOR CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY 14 DAYS EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Defendant Dayton Superior Corporation ("Dayton") and Plaintiff Pro-Shore, LLC ("Pro-Shore") (collectively, "the Parties") hereby stipulate to extend the due date for Dayton to answer or otherwise respond to Pro-Shore's Complaint. Dayton's response is currently due on November 5, 2017. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-1, the parties, through their res..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DAYTON SUPERIOR CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY 14 DAYS
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Defendant Dayton Superior Corporation ("Dayton") and Plaintiff Pro-Shore, LLC ("Pro-Shore") (collectively, "the Parties") hereby stipulate to extend the due date for Dayton to answer or otherwise respond to Pro-Shore's Complaint. Dayton's response is currently due on November 5, 2017. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-1, the parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that Dayton's time to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended by fourteen days, up to and including November 20, 2017.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
