Moralez v. Concord Feed & Fuel, Inc., 3:17-cv-01150-CRB. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171215993
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION: ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Francisca Moralez and Defendants, Concord Feed & Fuel, Inc. dba Concord Feed & Pet Supply; Daniel C. Helix, Trustee of the Helix Family Trust UTA dated December 15, 1992; Mary Lou Helix, Trustee of the Helix Family Trust UTA dated December 15, 1992; Steven R. Pucell aka Steven Pucell; Debra Hook; and Karen S. Hook, the parties to this action, that pursuant
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION: ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Francisca Moralez and Defendants, Concord Feed & Fuel, Inc. dba Concord Feed & Pet Supply; Daniel C. Helix, Trustee of the Helix Family Trust UTA dated December 15, 1992; Mary Lou Helix, Trustee of the Helix Family Trust UTA dated December 15, 1992; Steven R. Pucell aka Steven Pucell; Debra Hook; and Karen S. Hook, the parties to this action, that pursuant ..
More
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION: ORDER
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Francisca Moralez and Defendants, Concord Feed & Fuel, Inc. dba Concord Feed & Pet Supply; Daniel C. Helix, Trustee of the Helix Family Trust UTA dated December 15, 1992; Mary Lou Helix, Trustee of the Helix Family Trust UTA dated December 15, 1992; Steven R. Pucell aka Steven Pucell; Debra Hook; and Karen S. Hook, the parties to this action, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.
Source: Leagle
