Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pimentel v. Bonsall, 3:18-cv-01958-EMC. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180613b42 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDMENT OF COMPLAINT AND DISCOVERY EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiffs Rolando Pimentel and Zacharias Salas ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Robert Bonsall and Beeson, Tayer, & Bodine APC ("Defendants") (collectively, "the Parties") having met and conferred subsequent to the Case Management Conference held on May 31, 2018, hereby submit the following stipulation. The parties agree: 1. Plaintiffs will not be amending the Complaint as against
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDMENT OF COMPLAINT AND DISCOVERY

Plaintiffs Rolando Pimentel and Zacharias Salas ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Robert Bonsall and Beeson, Tayer, & Bodine APC ("Defendants") (collectively, "the Parties") having met and conferred subsequent to the Case Management Conference held on May 31, 2018, hereby submit the following stipulation. The parties agree:

1. Plaintiffs will not be amending the Complaint as against Defendants Robert Bonsall and Beeson, Tayer, & Bodine APC at this time, but reserve the right to do so after the pending motion to dismiss is resolved.

2. Pursuant to this Court's Civil Minutes of the May 31, 2018 Case Management Conference, counsel for the parties met and conferred on June 8, 2018 regarding the scope of discovery to be conducted between now and August 30, 2018, and have no disputes to report.

ATTESTATION

In accordance with Civ. L.R. 5.1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer