Robinson v. J.M. Smucker Company, 4:18-cv-04654-HSG. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181119852
Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Upon consideration of Defendant The J.M. Smucker Company's Unopposed Motion For Extension Of Defendant's Deadline To Reply To Plaintiff's Opposition To Defendant's Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby rules as follows
Summary: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Upon consideration of Defendant The J.M. Smucker Company's Unopposed Motion For Extension Of Defendant's Deadline To Reply To Plaintiff's Opposition To Defendant's Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby rules as follows:..
More
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
Upon consideration of Defendant The J.M. Smucker Company's Unopposed Motion For Extension Of Defendant's Deadline To Reply To Plaintiff's Opposition To Defendant's Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby rules as follows:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Defendant's deadline to reply to Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is December 5, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
