Guzman v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 17-cv-02606-HSG. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181205970
Visitors: 28
Filed: Dec. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON THE MODIFICATION OF THE CURRENT CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE Re: Dkt. No. 69 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . On December 3, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a motion to modify the current case management schedule, see Dkt. No. 68, and an accompanying ex parte application to shorten time for hearing on that motion, see Dkt. No. 69. Under Civil Local Rule 6-3, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to shorten time on the briefing schedul
Summary: ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON THE MODIFICATION OF THE CURRENT CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE Re: Dkt. No. 69 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . On December 3, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a motion to modify the current case management schedule, see Dkt. No. 68, and an accompanying ex parte application to shorten time for hearing on that motion, see Dkt. No. 69. Under Civil Local Rule 6-3, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to shorten time on the briefing schedule..
More
ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON THE MODIFICATION OF THE CURRENT CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
Re: Dkt. No. 69
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
On December 3, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a motion to modify the current case management schedule, see Dkt. No. 68, and an accompanying ex parte application to shorten time for hearing on that motion, see Dkt. No. 69. Under Civil Local Rule 6-3, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to shorten time on the briefing schedule but DENIES the request for hearing. In addition, the Court ORDERS Defendants to file their opposition to the motion to modify the current case management schedule by the close of business TODAY, DECEMBER 4.1 Because Plaintiffs have waived their reply, see Dkt. No. 69 at 2:19-20, and the Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument, the Court will deem the matter submitted upon receipt of Defendants' opposition, unless the Court orders otherwise. This Order terminates Dkt. No. 69.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Plaintiffs stated that they met and conferred with Defendants, who agreed to this expedited briefing schedule. See Dkt. No. 69 at 2:8-11.
Source: Leagle
