Abante Rooter and Plumbing Inc. v. Lead Excel, Inc., C 18-05750 WHA. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190306c51
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . On February 11, an order issued to the parties granting an extension to file the answer and partially staying the case pending the individual defendant's Chapter 13 bankruptcy (Dkt. No. 24). The order specifically requested a status report from both parties by February 28 that indicated whether or not the corporate defendant in this action is directly implicated by the individual defendant's Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding or whether o
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . On February 11, an order issued to the parties granting an extension to file the answer and partially staying the case pending the individual defendant's Chapter 13 bankruptcy (Dkt. No. 24). The order specifically requested a status report from both parties by February 28 that indicated whether or not the corporate defendant in this action is directly implicated by the individual defendant's Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding or whether or..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
On February 11, an order issued to the parties granting an extension to file the answer and partially staying the case pending the individual defendant's Chapter 13 bankruptcy (Dkt. No. 24). The order specifically requested a status report from both parties by February 28 that indicated whether or not the corporate defendant in this action is directly implicated by the individual defendant's Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding or whether or not the corporate defendant is undergoing its own bankruptcy proceeding. Since then, the only filing has been from the individual defendant advising that he has filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy (Dkt. No. 25). No one has complied with the prior order's request.
To that end, by MARCH 12, 2019, both plaintiff and the corporate defendant must file a status report as to whether the corporate defendant in this action is directly implicated by the individual defendant's Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding or whether or not the corporate defendant is undergoing its own bankruptcy proceeding and SHOW CAUSE why the prior order had not been complied with by the original date.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
