Whitson v. Lyft, Inc., 18-cv-06539-VC. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190618a95
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The Court has been advised by the Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend Defendants Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint filed on June 12, 2019, that the parties have resolved this case. (Re: Dkt. No. 57). Therefore, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. All deadlines and hearings in the case are vacated. Any pending motions are moot. The parties retain the right to reopen this action within 6
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The Court has been advised by the Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend Defendants Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint filed on June 12, 2019, that the parties have resolved this case. (Re: Dkt. No. 57). Therefore, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. All deadlines and hearings in the case are vacated. Any pending motions are moot. The parties retain the right to reopen this action within 60..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
The Court has been advised by the Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend Defendants Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint filed on June 12, 2019, that the parties have resolved this case. (Re: Dkt. No. 57). Therefore, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. All deadlines and hearings in the case are vacated. Any pending motions are moot.
The parties retain the right to reopen this action within 60 days of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. If a request to reinstate the case is not filed and served on opposing counsel within 60 days, the dismissal will be with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
