Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sprawldef v. City of Richmond, 18-cv-03918-YGR. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190809b11 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING RESPONDENTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO STAY; CONTINUING SCHEDULE ON PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ONE WEEK ONLY Dkt. No. 69 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . The Court having duly considered the administrative motion (Dkt. No. 69) and opposition thereto, the administrative motion of respondents City of Richmond, et al., to stay further briefing or consideration of petitioners' pending motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 64) is DENIED. The request, in the alternati
More

ORDER DENYING RESPONDENTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO STAY; CONTINUING SCHEDULE ON PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ONE WEEK ONLY Dkt. No. 69

The Court having duly considered the administrative motion (Dkt. No. 69) and opposition thereto, the administrative motion of respondents City of Richmond, et al., to stay further briefing or consideration of petitioners' pending motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 64) is DENIED.

The request, in the alternative, to delay filing of the City's response to the motion for preliminary injunction until September 17, 2019, is DENIED. The City has not offered facts sufficient to establish good cause for a delay of this length.

The City shall file its response to the motion for preliminary injunction no later than August 20, 2019.

Petitioners' reply shall be filed no later than August 27, 2019.

The hearing on the preliminary injunction shall be continued from September 3, 2019, to September 10, 2019, at 2:00 p.m.

This terminates Docket No. 69.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer