Best v. Sonoma County Sheriffs Department, 19-cv-02252-YGR. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191118804
Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. No. 43 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . The Court has received pro se plaintiff Brian Best's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 43.) The Court is in the process of addressing the parties' other filings, including defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement, and plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend. ( See Dkt. Nos. 34, 40.) At this stage — where defendant
Summary: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. No. 43 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . The Court has received pro se plaintiff Brian Best's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 43.) The Court is in the process of addressing the parties' other filings, including defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement, and plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend. ( See Dkt. Nos. 34, 40.) At this stage — where defendants..
More
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. No. 43
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
The Court has received pro se plaintiff Brian Best's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 43.) The Court is in the process of addressing the parties' other filings, including defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement, and plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend. (See Dkt. Nos. 34, 40.) At this stage — where defendants have not yet answered plaintiff's complaint — plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is premature.
Accordingly, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment.
This Order terminates Docket Number 43.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
