Perdomo v. S.V.S.P., 17-06962 BLF (PR). (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20200211b52
Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 07, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION (Docket No. 43) BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against prison officials at the Salinas Valley State Prison ("SVSP"). On June 28, 2019, the Court issued an order of service directing Defendants to file a dispositive motion. (Docket No. 26.) Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on December 30, 2019. (Docket No
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION (Docket No. 43) BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against prison officials at the Salinas Valley State Prison ("SVSP"). On June 28, 2019, the Court issued an order of service directing Defendants to file a dispositive motion. (Docket No. 26.) Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on December 30, 2019. (Docket No...
More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION
(Docket No. 43)
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials at the Salinas Valley State Prison ("SVSP"). On June 28, 2019, the Court issued an order of service directing Defendants to file a dispositive motion. (Docket No. 26.) Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on December 30, 2019. (Docket No. 42.) Plaintiff's opposition was due January 27, 2020. On February 5, 2020, Plaintiff filed an untimely motion for an extension of time of 90 days to file an opposition. (Docket No. 43.)
In the interest of justice, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment no later than March 12, 2020, which is an extension of 45 days from when the original opposition was due. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after Plaintiff's opposition is filed.
This order terminates Docket No. 43.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
