Filed: Feb. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Motion for Downward Variance [Docket No. 25] filed by defendant pro se on February 8, 2012. When a defendant is represented by counsel, this court will not accept pro se filings from that defendant. See United States v. Nichols, 374 F.3d 959 , 964, n.2 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing United States v. Guadalupe, 979 F.2d 790 , 795 (10th Cir. 1992)), reviewed on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1113 (2005). In this case, the
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Motion for Downward Variance [Docket No. 25] filed by defendant pro se on February 8, 2012. When a defendant is represented by counsel, this court will not accept pro se filings from that defendant. See United States v. Nichols, 374 F.3d 959 , 964, n.2 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing United States v. Guadalupe, 979 F.2d 790 , 795 (10th Cir. 1992)), reviewed on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1113 (2005). In this case, the ..
More
ORDER
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Motion for Downward Variance [Docket No. 25] filed by defendant pro se on February 8, 2012. When a defendant is represented by counsel, this court will not accept pro se filings from that defendant. See United States v. Nichols, 374 F.3d 959, 964, n.2 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing United States v. Guadalupe, 979 F.2d 790, 795 (10th Cir. 1992)), reviewed on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1113 (2005). In this case, the defendant is represented by counsel. As a result, defendant's pleading is improper. Therefore, it is
ORDERED that the Motion for Downward Variance [Docket No. 25] is STRICKEN.
