SHAW v. INTERTHINX, INC., 13-cv-01229-REB-BNB. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20140605c62
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge. This matter is before me sua sponte. As required by my previous Order [#202], 1 filed April 23, 2014, the parties were required to file a joint status report regarding their consideration of the mediator's proposal. The parties have complied with that directive, and now advise that they have reached a settlement but require further time to finalize all details relating to the settlement. ( See Joint Status Report 11 at 3 [#208], filed May
Summary: ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge. This matter is before me sua sponte. As required by my previous Order [#202], 1 filed April 23, 2014, the parties were required to file a joint status report regarding their consideration of the mediator's proposal. The parties have complied with that directive, and now advise that they have reached a settlement but require further time to finalize all details relating to the settlement. ( See Joint Status Report 11 at 3 [#208], filed May 3..
More
ORDER
ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge.
This matter is before me sua sponte. As required by my previous Order [#202],1 filed April 23, 2014, the parties were required to file a joint status report regarding their consideration of the mediator's proposal. The parties have complied with that directive, and now advise that they have reached a settlement but require further time to finalize all details relating to the settlement. (See Joint Status Report ¶ 11 at 3 [#208], filed May 30, 2014.)
Having reviewed the motion and being adequately advised of the premises, the court finds and concludes that the motion is well-taken and should be granted.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That this case continues to be STAYED pending further order of the court; and
2. That on or before June 30, 2014, the parties SHALL FILE a joint status report apprising the court of the progress and status of the settlement.
FootNotes
1. "[#202]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.
Source: Leagle
