U.S. v. CRILLEY, 14-cv-00969-WYD-KMT. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20140624d02
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER OF LIEN PRIORITY WILEY Y. DANIEL, Senior District Judge. Pursuant to the Stipulation between the United States of America and Defendant Rowdy W. Roth, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED THAT Lynn R. Crilley, as holder of Judgments for Child Support and Child Expense obligations entered against Defendant David W. Crilley have priority, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 6323(a), over the United States' federal tax liens against David W. Crilley for the tax years 2000 through 2005. It is
Summary: ORDER OF LIEN PRIORITY WILEY Y. DANIEL, Senior District Judge. Pursuant to the Stipulation between the United States of America and Defendant Rowdy W. Roth, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED THAT Lynn R. Crilley, as holder of Judgments for Child Support and Child Expense obligations entered against Defendant David W. Crilley have priority, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 6323(a), over the United States' federal tax liens against David W. Crilley for the tax years 2000 through 2005. It is ..
More
ORDER OF LIEN PRIORITY
WILEY Y. DANIEL, Senior District Judge.
Pursuant to the Stipulation between the United States of America and Defendant Rowdy W. Roth, and for good cause shown, it is hereby
ORDERED THAT Lynn R. Crilley, as holder of Judgments for Child Support and Child Expense obligations entered against Defendant David W. Crilley have priority, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6323(a), over the United States' federal tax liens against David W. Crilley for the tax years 2000 through 2005. It is further
ORDERED THAT the parties to this Stipulation agree to bear their own costs and attorney's fees, excepting the costs incurred in selling the Subject Property, which are to be reimbursed from the proceeds of the sale of the Subject Property prior to satisfying the outstanding liens on the property. It is further
ORDERED THAT Lynn R. Crilley shall not be required to appear at future hearings in this litigation and shall be treated as a non-party for all purposes including discovery purposes, unless ordered by the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
