U.S. v. ORR, 06-cr-00192-LTB (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20140710975
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER LEWIS T. BABCOCK, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant's pro se Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's June 4, 2014 Order and Request for an Additional Extension of Time to File a Reply to United States' Answer to Defendant's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Doc 777 — filed July 7, 2014). The Court finds the following: 1. Defendant's Motion to Vacate was filed February 18, 2014 (Doc 767). 2. Government's Response was filed March 20, 2014 (Doc 770). 3. was
Summary: ORDER LEWIS T. BABCOCK, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant's pro se Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's June 4, 2014 Order and Request for an Additional Extension of Time to File a Reply to United States' Answer to Defendant's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Doc 777 — filed July 7, 2014). The Court finds the following: 1. Defendant's Motion to Vacate was filed February 18, 2014 (Doc 767). 2. Government's Response was filed March 20, 2014 (Doc 770). 3. was g..
More
ORDER
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant's pro se Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's June 4, 2014 Order and Request for an Additional Extension of Time to File a Reply to United States' Answer to Defendant's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc 777 — filed July 7, 2014).
The Court finds the following:
1. Defendant's Motion to Vacate was filed February 18, 2014 (Doc 767).
2. Government's Response was filed March 20, 2014 (Doc 770).
3. was granted and the reply was due May 4, 2014.
4. 773) which was granted and the reply was due June 5, 2014.
5. Defendant filed a Motion for Additional Extension of Time on June 3, 2014 (Doc 775) which was granted to July 8, 2014 with an indication that no further extensions would be allowed.
Movant now seeks a further extension to file a reply until October 8, 2014 citing again medical reasons as further indicated by the attached Doctor's letter. That letter causes doubt that Defendant's mental and physical condition will be any better by October 8, 2014. The Court has his Petition and the Government's Response which in the exercise of my discretion I find adequate for consideration of the Petition. Accordingly
Defendant's Motion will be DENIED.
Source: Leagle
