HINDORFF v. U.S., 13-cv-03128-PAB-KLM. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20140827888
Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2014
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Joint Motion for a Settlement Conference [Docket No. 20]. The parties do not indicate what settlement efforts have taken place to date or why such efforts have been unsuccessful, especially given that the issues appear to have been narrowed. As a result, while the Court appreciates the parties' willingness to try to resolve this case, the Court does not feel it is appropriate for the assigned magistrate judge to co
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Joint Motion for a Settlement Conference [Docket No. 20]. The parties do not indicate what settlement efforts have taken place to date or why such efforts have been unsuccessful, especially given that the issues appear to have been narrowed. As a result, while the Court appreciates the parties' willingness to try to resolve this case, the Court does not feel it is appropriate for the assigned magistrate judge to con..
More
ORDER
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Joint Motion for a Settlement Conference [Docket No. 20]. The parties do not indicate what settlement efforts have taken place to date or why such efforts have been unsuccessful, especially given that the issues appear to have been narrowed. As a result, while the Court appreciates the parties' willingness to try to resolve this case, the Court does not feel it is appropriate for the assigned magistrate judge to conduct a settlement conference. Wherefore, it is
ORDERED that the Joint Motion for a Settlement Conference [Docket No. 20] is denied.
Source: Leagle
