PURDY v. COLVIN, 1:14-cv-01437-AP. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20141215726
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2014
Summary: ORDER JOHN L. KANE, District Judge. Upon review of Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Remand for Further Proceedings filed on December 12, 2014, IT IS ORDERED that said motion is granted. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Court orders that Defendant will remand the matter to an administrative law judge (ALJ) for further administrative proceedings on Plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, including a de novo hearing and a
Summary: ORDER JOHN L. KANE, District Judge. Upon review of Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Remand for Further Proceedings filed on December 12, 2014, IT IS ORDERED that said motion is granted. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Court orders that Defendant will remand the matter to an administrative law judge (ALJ) for further administrative proceedings on Plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, including a de novo hearing and a n..
More
ORDER
JOHN L. KANE, District Judge.
Upon review of Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Remand for Further Proceedings filed on December 12, 2014,
IT IS ORDERED that said motion is granted. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Court orders that Defendant will remand the matter to an administrative law judge (ALJ) for further administrative proceedings on Plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, including a de novo hearing and a new decision. Upon remand, the agency will direct the ALJ to: (1) further evaluate the medical and other opinions of record, explaining the reasons for the weight given to these opinions; (2) further consider Plaintiff's subjective complaints; (3) further evaluate Plaintiff's residual functional capacity; and (4) if warranted by the expanded record, obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert at step five of the sequential evaluation process.
Further, the Clerk will enter a judgment in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, consistent with the United States Supreme Court's decision in Shalala v. Shaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302 (1993).
Source: Leagle
