SAPUPPO v. ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 14-cv-03202-RM-KMT. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20150303880
Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER RAYMOND P. MOORE , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the parties' "Stipulation to Withdraw the Motion to Dismiss and Stipulation to Dismiss Claims against Adam Goodman with Prejudice." (ECF No. 18.) Previously, Defendants moved to dismiss all of Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Adam Goodman ("Goodman") and certain claims against Defendant Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company ("Allstate"). (ECF No. 9.) Based on the stipulation (ECF No. 18), the Court:
Summary: ORDER RAYMOND P. MOORE , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the parties' "Stipulation to Withdraw the Motion to Dismiss and Stipulation to Dismiss Claims against Adam Goodman with Prejudice." (ECF No. 18.) Previously, Defendants moved to dismiss all of Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Adam Goodman ("Goodman") and certain claims against Defendant Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company ("Allstate"). (ECF No. 9.) Based on the stipulation (ECF No. 18), the Court: ..
More
ORDER
RAYMOND P. MOORE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the parties' "Stipulation to Withdraw the Motion to Dismiss and Stipulation to Dismiss Claims against Adam Goodman with Prejudice." (ECF No. 18.) Previously, Defendants moved to dismiss all of Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Adam Goodman ("Goodman") and certain claims against Defendant Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company ("Allstate"). (ECF No. 9.)
Based on the stipulation (ECF No. 18), the Court:
(1) ACCEPTS the stipulation (ECF No. 18);
(2) DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Goodman (ECF No. 3) with each party to pay its own attorneys' fees and costs related to those claims against Defendant Goodman;
(3) ORDERS that the matter will proceed only as to Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Allstate (ECF No. 3); and
(4) DENIES as MOOT Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 9).
Source: Leagle
