MICHAEL J. WATANABE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in its capacity as Receiver for United Western Bank ("FDIC" or "Plaintiff"), and Defendants, Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.; Morgan Stanley & Co LLC; Morgan Stanley; RBS Acceptance Inc.; RBS Securities, Inc.; and RBS Holdings USA Inc. ("Defendants"), HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, by and though their undersigned counsel, that the following Joint Production Protocol for Electronically Stored Information and Paper Documents ("Protocol"), shall govern the production of documents, testimony, exhibits, electronically stored information ("ESI") and any other materials or information (including any abstract, any copies, summaries or derivations thereof) produced by the Parties during discovery in the above-captioned action (the "Action").
1. As used herein, the terms "Party" or "Parties" mean Plaintiff or Defendants or all of them, and the term "Third Party" means any person or entity that is served with a subpoena pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45. The provisions set forth herein shall govern document productions only by the Parties and their affiliates, though Third Parties are encouraged to adhere to them.
2. Absent special circumstances, the Parties will comply with this Protocol in producing ESI or other documents in this Action, with the exception of loan origination files, loan servicing files or other sources where compliance may be unduly burdensome.
3. By agreeing to this Protocol, the Parties do not admit that any ESI or other documents produced under its terms are relevant or admissible in this Action or in any other litigation.
4. The Parties will make reasonable efforts to ensure that all ESI they produce is decrypted, although media on which the Parties produce ESI may be encrypted for security purposes provided that appropriate password information is provided to all Parties to which such media are produced.
5. The Parties will make reasonable efforts to ensure that all ESI and other material they produce is legible to the same extent as it is maintained in the ordinary course of business.
6. Nothing in this Protocol shall be interpreted to require the disclosure of any ESI or other documents that a Party contends are protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, work-product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege or protection, nor shall this Protocol require the production of ESI or other documents that are not discoverable under applicable law.
7. If ESI or other documents protected from disclosure under the attorney-client privilege, work-product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege or protection are produced in this action, the disclosure is presumed to be inadvertent and not a waiver of the privilege or protection. Upon discovering that privileged or protected ESI or other documents were disclosed, the Parties shall follow the clawback procedure set forth in the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Governing the Treatment of Confidential and Highly Confidential Discovery Material ("Protective Order"), filed on or around June 11, 2015.
8. The Parties agree to confer in good faith as to discovery of ESI and other documents as necessary.
9. "Native File(s)" means ESI in the electronic format of the application in which such ESI is created, viewed, and/or modified in the ordinary course of business. Native Files are a subset of ESI.
10. "Metadata" means: (i) information embedded in a Native File that is not ordinarily viewable or printable from the application that generated, edited, or modified such Native File; and (ii) information generated automatically by the operation of a computer or other information technology system when a Native File is created, modified, transmitted, deleted, or otherwise manipulated by a user of such system. Metadata is a subset of ESI.
11. "Static Image(s)" means a representation of ESI produced by converting a Native File into a standard image format capable of being viewed and printed on standard computer systems. In the absence of agreement between the Parties or between the Parties and a Third Party or order of the Court, a Static Image shall be provided in Tagged Image File Format ("TIFF," or ".TIF" files). If a TIFF or .TIF file cannot be created, then the Static Image shall be represented in the form of a placeholder TIFF image as provided for in ¶ 16(c). An image load/unitization file in a standard .opt or .log litigation support image load format shall be included that provides: (i) the document number for each image; (ii) the full path name(s) of each TIFF that represents an image; and (iii) the document boundaries for each document. The load file shall be in the order that appropriately corresponds with each image file. The following represents the format of a standard .opt or .log image load/unitization file: Bates, Volume, Path_to_image, Document Break, Folder Break, Box break, Total_Pages.
12. The Parties agree to produce hard-copy documents in black-and-white, single-page, 300 DPI Group IV TIFF image format named according to Bates number accompanied by document level optical character recognition ("OCR") text files. Documents shall be provided with Concordance-compatible image and data load files (i.e., OPT and .DAT files) using standard Concordance delimiters. The load file shall indicate document breaks, and the metadata file shall include at least the following fields: (1) Custodian (Name of custodian from whom the document was collected); (2) Doc Type (indicating scanned hard copy document); (3) Page Count; (4) Bates Begin (beginning production number); and (5) Bates End (ending production number).
13. Absent special circumstances, the Parties will use reasonable efforts to scan hard-copy documents such that the images appear the same as the documents are kept in ordinary course of business. Reducing image size may be necessary to fit page size or display production numbers and confidentiality designations without obscuring text.
14. A producing party may produce color hard-copy documents as black-and-white images. Where the original of a produced document is in color, and color is material to the interpretation of the document, the receiving party may request that the document be produced in color, and the producing party shall make reasonable efforts to produce the document in color.
15. If any original hard-copy document has notes affixed thereto or attachments, the Parties will scan and produce copies of the original hard-copy documents, along with the notes or attachments affixed thereto, unless privileged, in the same manner as other documents. If the notes or attachments obscure any information on the original hard-copy document, the Parties will also produce copies of the original hard-copy documents without the notes or attachments affixed thereto in order to make the underlying information visible.
16. The Parties will make best efforts to identify the individual custodian (or if the individual custodian is not reasonably ascertainable, the custodial group) for hard-copy documents.
17. The Parties agree to produce ESI in black-and-white, single-page 300 DPI Group IV TIFF image format named according to Bates number with the exception of items listed in paragraphs (A)-(D) below. Additionally, the Parties agree to deliver extracted text corresponding to each imaged document. Absent special circumstances, the extracted text shall be delivered as separate document level text files. Absent special circumstances, if a document does not contain extractable text, the producing party shall provide OCR files for that document. In addition to the single page TIFF images and extracted text files, the Parties agree to provide load files linking the TIFFs with their associated text file and metadata such that the documents shall be loadable into document management software such as Concordance. Exceptions:
18. If a document has been redacted, OCR of the redacted document will suffice in lieu of extracted text. For documents that contain redacted text, the parties may either apply the redactions directly on the native file itself or produce TIFF image files with burned in redactions in lieu of a Native File and TIFF placeholder image.
19. Attachments, enclosures, and/or exhibits to any parent document also shall be produced in proximity to the respective parent document containing the attachments, enclosures, and/or exhibits.
20. The Parties agree that all ESI shall be produced with the following metadata or its equivalent to the extent reasonably available for a particular document:
21. The Parties will cooperate, as appropriate, to facilitate the acquisition of appropriate licenses and technical information necessary to review Native Files. In the event that ESI is produced in a format that is not reasonably usable by the requesting party, the receiving party may request that the producing party produce such ESI in a different format, the production of which shall not unreasonably be withheld.
22. To reduce the unnecessary costs of reviewing and producing exact duplicate documents, each party may remove exact duplicate ESI (a "deduplicated version"), including without limitation across custodians, so long as the producing party produces searchable metadata in the "Source" field or in a "Duplicate Custodian" field for each produced document sufficient for the receiving party to identify all custodians of any de-duplicated versions of such document. The Parties shall use industry standard MD5 or SHA-1 hash algorithms to facilitate the de-duplication process. The Parties will not de-duplicate attachments to emails against loose files.
23. When converting ESI from its native format into its production format, to the extent reasonably practicable; (i) all tracked changes shall be processed to make them visible if they existed when the file was collected; (ii) author comments shall be processed to be made visible if they existed when the file was collected; (iii) hidden columns and rows shall not be altered and shall be retained in the manner in which they existed when the file was collected; (iv) presenter notes shall be processed to make them visible if they existed when the file was collected; and (v) auto-populated fields, with the exception of auto-populating "page number" fields, may be replaced with text indicating the field name. For example, auto-populating "date" fields shall be replaced with the text "Date," and auto-populating "file path" fields shall be replaced with the text "Path" (or other similar text).
24. The Parties agree to confer in good faith about any other technology or process that a producing party proposes to use to streamline the culling, review, and production of ESI (e.g., email threading, near de-duplication, technology assisted review). The Parties shall make good faith efforts to resolve any objections to the use of such technology or processes before seeking relief from the Court.
25. Nothing in this Protocol is meant to supersede, replace or substitute any of the provisions set forth in the Protective Order entered in this case. This Protocol is fully subject to the Protective Order. If there is a conflict between the provisions of this Protocol and the Protective Order entered by the Court, the Protective Order shall control.
26. The Parties do not waive any objections to the production, discoverability, or confidentiality of ESI and hard-copy documents, including, without limitation, objections regarding the burden, overbreadth, or relevance of document requests related to ESI and hard-copy materials, or relating to the production of ESI or hard-copy documents in a form specified in this Protocol. The Parties shall make their best efforts to comply with and resolve any differences concerning compliance with this Protocol.
IT IS SO ORDERED.