FORTE SUPPLY, LLC v. MOJO FROZEN YOGURT, LLC, 13-cv-00797-RM-BNB. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20150903887
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER NINA Y. WANG , Magistarte Judge . This matter comes before the court on the Parties' Stipulated Motion for Order Directing Removal of Internet Discussions of Plaintiff Pursuant to Settlement Agreement ("Stipulated Motion for Order") [#101, filed August 28, 2015], which was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Order of Reference dated May 23, 2015 [#18], the Reassignment dated February 9, 2015 [#94], and the Memorandum dated August 28, 2015 [#102]. The court has
Summary: ORDER NINA Y. WANG , Magistarte Judge . This matter comes before the court on the Parties' Stipulated Motion for Order Directing Removal of Internet Discussions of Plaintiff Pursuant to Settlement Agreement ("Stipulated Motion for Order") [#101, filed August 28, 2015], which was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Order of Reference dated May 23, 2015 [#18], the Reassignment dated February 9, 2015 [#94], and the Memorandum dated August 28, 2015 [#102]. The court has ..
More
ORDER
NINA Y. WANG, Magistarte Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the Parties' Stipulated Motion for Order Directing Removal of Internet Discussions of Plaintiff Pursuant to Settlement Agreement ("Stipulated Motion for Order") [#101, filed August 28, 2015], which was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Order of Reference dated May 23, 2015 [#18], the Reassignment dated February 9, 2015 [#94], and the Memorandum dated August 28, 2015 [#102]. The court has reviewed the Parties' request and the Settlement Agreement provided as [#101-2], and IT IS ORDERED:
(1) The Stipulated Motion for Order [#101] is GRANTED;
(2) The Settlement Agreement tendered by the Parties is APPROVED;
(3) Pursuant to Paragraph 2.3 of the Settlement Agreement, Defendants are DIRECTED to remove any and all online reviews and comments concerning Plaintiffs from any website upon which an online review was posted, including http://www.merchantcircle.com/business/Forte.Supply.720-328-1020 and https://plus.google.com103822417634752770013/reviews;
(4) Pursuant to Rule 65(d)(2), this Order binds (i) the Parties; (ii) the Parties' officers, agent, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (iii) other persons who are in active concert or participation with anyone described in (i) or (ii), including but not limited to merchantcircle.com and google.com to the extent they fall within the scope of (iii);
(5) To the extent that merchantcircle.com falls within the scope of Rule 65(d)(2), it is DIRECTED to REMOVE the review posted by "thouria" found at http://www.merchantcircle.com/business/Forte.Supply.720-328-1020;
(6) To the extent that google.com falls within the scope of Rule 65(d)(2), it is DIRECTED TO REMOVE the information found at https://plus.google.com103822417634752770013/reviews;
(7) Defendants are directed to serve a copy of this Order, by personal service or otherwise, on merchantcircle.com and google.com in order to provide actual notice as contemplated by Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Source: Leagle
