ORDER

KRISTEN L. MIX, Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court1 on the parties' Stipulation for Equal Access to Justice Act Attorney Fees [#31],2 (the "Motion"). In the Motion, the parties agree that Plaintiff should be awarded $4,500.00 in attorneys' fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412, the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"). Motion [#31] at 1. Under the EAJA, a party who prevails against the United States in court, including a successful Social Security benefits claimant, may be awarded fees if the position of the United States was not "substantially justified" and there are no special circumstances that make an award of fees unjust. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A); Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002). Where, as here, a Social Security disability claimant obtains a remand to the Commissioner under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), she is a prevailing party for purposes of the EAJA. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302 (1993).

Having reviewed the hours and hourly rate of Plaintiff's attorney, Teresa H. Abbott, see [#31-2], and given the parties' agreement to an award of $4,500.00, the Court finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#31] is GRANTED. Accordingly,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall pay Plaintiff $4,500.00 in attorneys' fees under the EAJA.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if, after receiving this Order, the Commissioner (1) determines that Plaintiff has assigned the EAJA fees to his attorney, (2) determines upon effectuation of this Order that Plaintiff does not owe a debt which is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, and (3) agrees to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, the fees will be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney. However, if there is a debt owned under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiff's attorney.