Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ANDERSON v. MILLER, 15-cv-905-WJM. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20151202b31 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2015
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM J. MART NEZ , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the pro se "Motion to Address Issues & Respond to 11-18, 15 Order" (ECF No. 28) filed November 25, 2015, by Applicant, James Anderson. Although not entirely clear, Mr. Anderson apparently alleges in the motion that he has not received a copy of the Court's Order to Dismiss in Part (ECF No. 22) entered in this action on September 23, 2015, or a copy of the Answer (ECF No. 23) filed by Respondents on October 22,
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the pro se "Motion to Address Issues & Respond to 11-18, 15 Order" (ECF No. 28) filed November 25, 2015, by Applicant, James Anderson. Although not entirely clear, Mr. Anderson apparently alleges in the motion that he has not received a copy of the Court's Order to Dismiss in Part (ECF No. 22) entered in this action on September 23, 2015, or a copy of the Answer (ECF No. 23) filed by Respondents on October 22, 2015. The Court construes the motion liberally as a motion for copies of those documents. So construed, the motion will be granted. Applicant shall continue to have up to and including January 7, 2016, to file a traverse. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the "Motion to Address Issues & Respond to 11-18, 15 Order" (ECF No. 28), which the Court has construed as a request for copies of the Court's Order to Dismiss in Part (ECF No. 22) and the Answer (ECF No. 23) filed by Respondents, is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court mail to Applicant, together with a copy of this Order, a copy of the Court's Order to Dismiss in Part (ECF No. 22) and the Answer (ECF No. 23) filed by Respondents.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer