Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DONOVAN v. COLVIN, 15-cv-00516-REB. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20151207c48 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN , District Judge . Proceeding under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d), the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) by filing the Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge [#13], 1 filed September 4, 2015. Thus, the case should be drawn to a magistrate judge. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a) and (b) this action shall be co-assigned to a full-time m
More

ORDER

Proceeding under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d), the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) by filing the Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge [#13],1 filed September 4, 2015. Thus, the case should be drawn to a magistrate judge.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a) and (b) this action shall be co-assigned to a full-time magistrate judge;

2. That the case caption shall include the initials of both the district judge and the magistrate judge to whom the case is assigned; and

3. That once a magistrate judge has been co-assigned, this court will issue an order of reference under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(e) reassigning the action to the magistrate judge currently co-assigned to the case.

FootNotes


1. "[#17]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer