Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WITT v. SNIDER, 16-cv-01303-MSK-CBS. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20170317b23 Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2017
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER SUBSTITUTING TRUSTEE AND DENYING MOTIONS MARCIA S. KRIEGER , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte Mr. Witt initially commenced this action, alleging various federal and state-law claims against the Defendants; the Defendants moved to dismiss Mr. Witt's claims and filed counter-and cross-claims, which prompted additional motions to dismiss. On March 9, 2017, Mr. Witt filed a Notice of Bankruptcy Filing (# 103), indicating that he had f
More

OPINION AND ORDER SUBSTITUTING TRUSTEE AND DENYING MOTIONS

THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte

Mr. Witt initially commenced this action, alleging various federal and state-law claims against the Defendants; the Defendants moved to dismiss Mr. Witt's claims and filed counter-and cross-claims, which prompted additional motions to dismiss.

On March 9, 2017, Mr. Witt filed a Notice of Bankruptcy Filing (# 103), indicating that he had filed an individual Chapter 7 case in his own name in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado. Ms. Steinle has been named as the Trustee of Mr. Witt's estate.

The filing of the bankruptcy case and appointment of Ms. Steinle terminates Mr. Witt's authority to pursue this case in his own name; the decision as to what claims (if any) to pursue now belongs to Ms. Steinle. Moreover, the filing of the bankruptcy case operates to automatically stay any counterclaims by the Defendants against Mr. Witt. For these reasons, the Court issues the following orders:

1. The caption of this case is AMENDED to substitute "JANICE A. STEINLE, as Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Matthew C. Witt" as the named Plaintiff. All future filings in this case shall use this caption.

2. Within 28 days of the date of this Order, Ms. Steinle shall file an Amended Complaint that reflects the claims she intends to pursue on behalf of the estate, shall dismiss this suit, or shall take such other action as she deems appropriate with regard to this matter.

3. Because the instant motions are directed at pleadings that are likely to be altered by Ms. Steinle's decisions, all pending motions in this action (# 30, 31, 32, 66, 90, 91, 92, 95, 104) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

4. The Court will conduct a non-evidentiary law and motion hearing at 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 23, 2017, for the purpose of addressing how this case shall proceed in light of the claim(s), if any, Ms. Steinle chooses to pursue and the counterclaims, if any, the Defendants may assert.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer