Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PEGGY F. WESLEY vs SAINT LUCIE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, 18-002066 (2018)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 18-002066 Visitors: 16
Petitioner: PEGGY F. WESLEY
Respondent: SAINT LUCIE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Judges: JUNE C. MCKINNEY
Agency: Florida Commission on Human Relations
Locations: Fort Pierce, Florida
Filed: Apr. 20, 2018
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, August 30, 2019.

Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2019
Summary: The issues in this case are whether Respondent engaged in an unlawful employment practice against Petitioner on the basis of disability, and whether Respondent retaliated against Petitioner in violation of the Civil Rights Act.Petitioner failed to demonstrate Respondent committed an unlawful employment practice by harassment, discrimination or rataliation for her disability.
SKM_30819111218060


STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS


PEGGY F. WESLEY,


Petitioner,


v.

SAINT LUCIE COUNTY SHERIFF'S, OFFICE,

EEOC Case No. 15D201600874 FCHR Case No. 2016-01889 DOAH Case No. 18-2066 FCHR Order No. 19-063


Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----/'


FINAL ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM AN UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE


Preliminary Matters


Petitioner Peggy F. Wesley filed a complaint of discrimination pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Sections 760.01 - 760.11, Florida Statutes (2016), alleging that Respondent, Saint Lucie County Sheriffs Office, committed an unlawful employment practice on the basis of Petitioner's disability and on the basis of retaliation for having engaged in a protected activity.

The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on March 16, 2018, the Executive Director issued a determination finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe that an unlawful employment practice had occurred.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice, and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.

An evidentiary hearing was held before Administrative Law Judge June C. McKinney in Port St. Lucie, Florida, on November 30, 2018, and February 11 and 12, 2019, and by video teleconferencing in Fort Pierce and Tallahassee, Florida, on May 28, 2019.

Judge McKinney issued a Recommended Order, dated August 30, 2019, recommending that the Commission dismiss the Petition for Relief.

The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.


Findings of Fact


We find the Administrative Law Judge's findings of fact to be supported by competent substantial evidence.

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge's findings of fact.


Filed November 13, 2019 8:00 AM Division of Administrative Hearings


Conclusions of Law


The Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 prohibits discrimination on the bases of race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, and marital status. Section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2019). Also, "[i]t is an unlawful employment practice for an employer, an employment agency, a joint labor-management committee, or a labor organization to discriminate against any person because that person has opposed any practice which is an unlawful employment practice under this section, or because that person has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this section." Section 760.10(7), Florida Statutes (2019). And furthermore, the Commission has no enforcement responsibility, under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, for the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Thus, we disagree with the conclusion of law that the Administrative Law Judge had jurisdiction to decide Petitioner's claims of FMLA retaliation, and that the Commission, consequently, has jurisdiction to do the same. In addition, we disagree with the Administrative Law Judge's assertion that taking leave under the FMLA is a protected activity under section 760.10(7), Florida Statutes.

Based on the foregoing, we reject the Administrative Law Judge's conclusions of law set out at Recommended Order, ,r 81, ,r 96, ,r 99, ,r101, and ,r 102. In correcting these conclusions oflaw we conclude: (l) that the conclusions oflaw being modified/rejected are conclusions of law over which the Commission has substantive jurisdiction; (2) that the reason the corrections are being made by the Commission is that the conclusions of law as stated apply statutory provisions not related to this case; and (3) that in making these modifications/rejections the conclusions of law being substituted are as or more reasonable than the conclusions of law which have been rejected. See, Section

120.57(1)(I), Florida Statutes (2019).

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge's conclusions of law set out at Recommended Order, ,r 80, ,r 82 through ,r 95, ,r 97, ,r 98, ,r 100, and ,r 103.


Exceptions


Respondent filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge's Recommended Order in a document, "Respondent's Exceptions to Recommended Order," filed with the Division of Administrative Hearings on September 12, 2019.

While the exceptions document was filed with the Division of Administrative Hearings instead of the Commission, the document was timely filed, and the Commission will consider the document even though it was filed in the wrong forum. Accord, generally, Bristol v. American Water, FCHR Order No. 15-041 (July 9, 2015), Medina v. Department of Children and Families, FCHR Order No. 12-016 (April 23, 2012), St Louis v. Florida Physician Medical Group, FCHR Order No. 11-078 (October 6, 2011), Garcia v. Heart of Florida Medical Center, FCHR Order No. 10-061 (August 10, 2010)


and Lane v. Terry Laboratories, Inc., FCHR Order No. 08-022 (April 14, 2008), and cases cited therein.

The exceptions document takes issue with the Administrative Law Judge's conclusion that she had jurisdiction to decide Petitioner's claims of FMLA retaliation, and that the Commission, consequently, has jurisdiction to decide the claims too.

We have dealt with this issue in the Conclusions of Law section of this Order,

above.


Dismissal


The Petition for Relief and Complaint of Discrimination are DISMISSED with prejudice.

w ,

The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110.


DONE AND ORDERED this -11_ day of 2019.

FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS:


Commissioner Tony Jenkins, Panel Chairperson;

Commissioner Donna Elam (not present and did not participate); and Commissioner Rebecca Steele


Filed this J;lday of , 2019, in Tallahassee, Florida.


Commission on Human Relations 4075 Esplanade Way, Room 110

Tallahassee, FL 32399

(850) 488-7082


Copies furnished to:


Peggy Wesley [address of record]


Saint Lucie County Sheriffs Office c/o R.W. Evans

Allen Norton & Blue, PA 906 N. Monroe Street Tallahassee, FL 32303


June C. McKinney, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH Stanley Gorsica. Legal Advisor for Commission Panel

listed addressees this /6 day of 2019.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a corr,:z::rcg has been mailed to the above

-#-=>o,,-0'-'-'F=-=---'


ssion

Florida Commission on Human Relations


Docket for Case No: 18-002066
Issue Date Proceedings
Nov. 13, 2019 Respondent's Exceptions to Recommended Order filed.
Nov. 13, 2019 Agency Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice filed.
Nov. 12, 2019 Notice of Filing in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed.
Nov. 08, 2019 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss filed.
Sep. 12, 2019 Respondent's Exceptions to Recommended Order filed.
Aug. 30, 2019 Recommended Order (hearing held .February 11 and 12, 2019). CASE CLOSED.
Aug. 30, 2019 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Jul. 19, 2019 Response to Respondent?s Motion to Strike filed.
Jul. 19, 2019 Respondent's Motion to Strike filed.
Jul. 18, 2019 Petitioner's Amended Recommended Order filed.
Jul. 18, 2019 Response to Respondent?s Motion to Strike filed.
Jul. 18, 2019 Respondent's Motion to Strike filed.
Jul. 17, 2019 Petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Jul. 08, 2019 Respondent's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Jul. 05, 2019 Order Granting Motion to Strike.
Jul. 03, 2019 Response to Respondents Motion to Strike filed.
Jul. 03, 2019 Respondent's Motion to Strike filed.
Jul. 02, 2019 Petitioner's Additional Information filed.
Jul. 02, 2019 Petitioner's Additional Information filed.
Jul. 02, 2019 Respondent's Additional Proposed Exhibit filed (exhibits not available for viewing). 
 Confidential document; not available for viewing.
Jun. 20, 2019 Notice of Filing Transcript.
Jun. 20, 2019 Transcript of Proceedings (not available for viewing) filed.
Jun. 20, 2019 Transcript of Hearing Proceedings (May 28, 2019-Vol. 3) filed.
Jun. 20, 2019 Transcript of Hearing Proceedings (February 12-Vol. 5) filed.
Jun. 20, 2019 Transcript of Hearing Proceedings (February 12, 2019-Vol. 4) filed.
Jun. 20, 2019 Transcript of Hearing Proceedings (February 11, 2019-Vol 3) filed.
Jun. 20, 2019 Transcript of Hearing Proceedings (February 11, 2019-Vol 2) filed.
Jun. 20, 2019 Transcripts of Proceedings (November 30, 2018) filed.
Jun. 20, 2019 Notice of Filing Transcripts filed.
May 31, 2019 Respondent's Proposed Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing).
May 31, 2019 Notice of Filing Exhibits filed.
May 28, 2019 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
May 22, 2019 Court Reporter Request filed.
Mar. 20, 2019 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for May 28, 2019; 9:30 a.m.; Fort Pierce and Tallahassee, FL).
Mar. 18, 2019 Notice of Availability for Hearing filed.
Feb. 26, 2019 Order Granting Continuance (parties to advise status by March 18, 2019).
Feb. 26, 2019 Petitioner's Request for Continuance filed.
Feb. 22, 2019 FYI (to Judge McKinney from Petitioner regarding hearing date) filed.
Feb. 22, 2019 Respondent's Proposed Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing).
Feb. 21, 2019 Respondent's Third Amended Exhibit List for Hearing filed.
Feb. 21, 2019 Order Regarding Additional Proposed Exhibits.
Feb. 15, 2019 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for March 1, 2019; 9:30 a.m.; Fort Pierce and Tallahassee, FL).
Feb. 11, 2019 CASE STATUS: Hearing Partially Held; continued to March 1, 2019; 9:30 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL.
Feb. 05, 2019 Notice of Filing (exhibits in support of Respondent's Third Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence) filed.
Feb. 05, 2019 Respondent's Third Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence filed.
Feb. 04, 2019 Respondent's Second Amended Exhibit List for Hearing filed.
Feb. 04, 2019 Respondent's Second Amended Witness List for Hearing filed.
Feb. 01, 2019 Court Reporter Request filed.
Jan. 30, 2019 Order on Second Motion in Limine.
Jan. 30, 2019 Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Second Motion In Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence filed.
Jan. 24, 2019 Notice of Ex Parte Communication.
Jan. 24, 2019 Respondent's Second Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence filed.
Jan. 24, 2019 Petitioner's Relocation Request filed.
Jan. 10, 2019 Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for February 11 and 12, 2019; 9:30 a.m.; Port St. Lucie, FL; amended as to hearing location).
Dec. 21, 2018 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for February 11 and 12, 2019; 9:30 a.m.; Port St. Lucie, FL).
Dec. 03, 2018 Order Continuing Hearing (parties to advise status by December 17, 2018).
Nov. 30, 2018 CASE STATUS: Hearing Partially Held; continued to date not certain.
Nov. 29, 2018 Respondent's Amended Witness List for Hearing filed.
Nov. 28, 2018 (New) Court Reporter Request filed.
Nov. 21, 2018 Court Reporter Request filed.
Nov. 16, 2018 Respondent's Amended Exhibit List for Hearing (with Exhibit 41) filed (medical information; not available for viewing). 
 Confidential document; not available for viewing.
Nov. 15, 2018 Respondent's Notice of Intent to Order Transcript filed.
Aug. 27, 2018 Order Rescheduling Hearing (hearing set for November 30, 2018; 9:30 a.m.; Port St. Lucie, FL).
Aug. 17, 2018 Notice of Availability for Hearing filed.
Aug. 07, 2018 Order Granting Continuance (parties to advise status by August 21, 2018).
Aug. 07, 2018 Petitioner's amended motion for continuation filed.
Aug. 06, 2018 Petitioner's Response to Motion in Limine filed (medical information; not available for viewing). 
 Confidential document; not available for viewing.
Aug. 06, 2018 Petitioner's Request for a Continuation filed.
Jul. 30, 2018 Respondent's Motion in Limine filed.
Jul. 30, 2018 Respondent's Exhibit List for Hearing (with exhibits 1-40) filed (medical Information; not available for viewing). 
 Confidential document; not available for viewing.
Jul. 30, 2018 Respondent's Witness List for Hearing filed.
May 15, 2018 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
May 15, 2018 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for August 10, 2018; 9:30 a.m.; Port St. Lucie, FL).
May 07, 2018 Respondent's Motion for Summary Hearing filed.
May 02, 2018 Amended Response to the Initial Order filed.
May 01, 2018 Amended Response to the Initial Order filed.
Apr. 27, 2018 Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
Apr. 27, 2018 Response to the Initial Order filed.
Apr. 27, 2018 Petitioner's Response to Initial Order filed.
Apr. 20, 2018 Initial Order.
Apr. 20, 2018 Employment Charge of Discrimination filed. (medical information; not available for viewing) 
 Confidential document; not available for viewing.
Apr. 20, 2018 Notice of Determination: No Reasonable Cause filed.
Apr. 20, 2018 Determination: No Reasonable Cause filed.
Apr. 20, 2018 Petition for Relief filed. (Medical information; not available for viewing) 
 Confidential document; not available for viewing.
Apr. 20, 2018 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.

Orders for Case No: 18-002066
Issue Date Document Summary
Nov. 12, 2019 Agency Final Order
Aug. 30, 2019 Recommended Order Petitioner failed to demonstrate Respondent committed an unlawful employment practice by harassment, discrimination or rataliation for her disability.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer