Cummings Machine Works v. Clark, (1925)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 16
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: R. B. Huffaker, for Plaintiff in Error;
No appearance for Defendants in Error.
Filed: May 07, 1925
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer should not have been sustained. McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co., 88 Fla. 80 , 101 South. Rep. 28; Pero v. Corlet, 87 Fla. 448 , 10 South. Rep. 748. Reversed. WEST, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, BROWNE AND TERRELL, J. J., concur.
The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer should not have been sustained. McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co., 88 Fla. 80, 101 South. Rep. 28; Pero v. Corlet, 87 Fla. 448, 10 South. Rep. 748.
Reversed.
WEST, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, BROWNE AND TERRELL, J. J., concur.
Source: CourtListener
