Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sigmond v. Burrows, (1927)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number: 
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Franks Franks and B. G. Adcock, for Appellant; Kearley, Fisher, VanMetre and Chapman and Horblit Wasserman (of Boston, Mass.), for Appellees.
Filed: Nov. 07, 1927
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This is an appeal from the order of the chancellor sustaining a demurrer to an original bill of complaint and thereafter sustaining the demurrer to an amended bill of complaint and dismissing the bill of complaint. The same should be sustained and affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of Massengale v. O'Hara, 63 Fla. 521 , 58 So. 42 , and it is so ordered. Affirmed. WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur. *Page 885

This is an appeal from the order of the chancellor sustaining a demurrer to an original bill of complaint and thereafter sustaining the demurrer to an amended bill of complaint and dismissing the bill of complaint. The same should be sustained and affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of Massengale v. O'Hara, 63 Fla. 521, 58 So. 42, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur. *Page 885

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer