Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Richmond v. State, (1929)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 3
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Bart A. Riley, for Plaintiff in Error; Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.
Filed: Jul. 02, 1929
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the *Page 115 judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the sa
More

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the *Page 115 judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, STRUM AND BUFORD, J. J., concur

BROWN, J., dissents.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer