Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: B. A. Meginniss, and Hampton Hampton, for Plaintiff in Error;
Charles P. Cooper, for Defendants in Error.
Filed: May 05, 1930
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: It has been suggested by the defendant in error that the Court should dismiss the writ of error in this cause upon its own motion, because the transcript of the record contains no final judgment to which a writ of error will lie. Section 4606, Comp. Gen. Laws of Florida 1927, provides that "Writs of error shall lie only from final judgments," except from an order granting a new trial at law, and it is a rule of this Court that where no final judgment appears in the record, whether a motion be ma
Summary: It has been suggested by the defendant in error that the Court should dismiss the writ of error in this cause upon its own motion, because the transcript of the record contains no final judgment to which a writ of error will lie. Section 4606, Comp. Gen. Laws of Florida 1927, provides that "Writs of error shall lie only from final judgments," except from an order granting a new trial at law, and it is a rule of this Court that where no final judgment appears in the record, whether a motion be mad..
More
The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the writ of error in this cause should be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.
TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, STRUM, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
