Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wright v. Tatarian, (1930)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 9
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Thompson Thompson and C. C. Youmans, for Plaintiffs in Error; Huber, Blackwell Gray, for S. H. Tatarian, one of the Defendants in Error.
Filed: Nov. 24, 1930
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, *Page 1367 therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the
More

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, *Page 1367 therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed on the authority of Crackwaner v. Carlton Natl. Bank, 98 Fla. 792, 124 So. R. 275, and Edgar v. Bacon, 97 Fla. 679, 122 So. R. 107.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., and WHITFIELD and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer