Harford v. Graves, (1931)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 17
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: James M. Carson and W. Theo Woodward, for Plaintiff in Error;
Hull, Landis Whitehair and Scarlett, Jordan, Futch Fielding for Defendants in Error.
Filed: Aug. 07, 1931
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer thereto should not have been sustained. Cummings Machine Works v. Clark, 89 Fla. 383 , 105 So. 100 , Garsed v. Sugarman, 99 Fla. 191 , 126 So. 157 . Final judgment on demurrer reversed for appropriate proceedings. *Page 836 BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, BROWN AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.
The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer thereto should not have been sustained. Cummings Machine Works v. Clark, 89 Fla. 383,105 So. 100, Garsed v. Sugarman, 99 Fla. 191, 126 So. 157.
Final judgment on demurrer reversed for appropriate proceedings.
BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, BROWN AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.
Source: CourtListener
