State, Ex Rel. v. Whitman, (1933)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 18
Judges: DAVIS, C. J. —
Attorneys: R. J. Duff and Whitaker Brothers, for Appellant;
McKay, Withers Ramsey, for Appellees.
Filed: Oct. 03, 1933
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 198 This case is before us on motion to quash alternative writ of mandamus. On consideration of the motion, the Court being advised of its opinion in the premises, and having considered briefs and arguments therein submitted by the respective parties. It is now ordered and adjudged that the motion to quash be, and the same is hereby, overruled and denied and
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 198 This case is before us on motion to quash alternative writ of mandamus. On consideration of the motion, the Court being advised of its opinion in the premises, and having considered briefs and arguments therein submitted by the respective parties. It is now ordered and adjudged that the motion to quash be, and the same is hereby, overruled and denied and r..
More
My ground of dissent is that in my opinion the nature of this case was such that the proper remedy was by writ of certiorari and not by mandamus.
Source: CourtListener
