Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Murden v. Miami Poultry Egg Co., (1934)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 10
Judges: ELLIS, J. —
Attorneys: Dickinson Dickinson, Crofton Wilson and Akerman Gray, for Plaintiff in Error; George G. Herring, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Feb. 07, 1934
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: In this case the assignments of error and the briefs of the plaintiff in error present a number of questions which this Court is invited to consider, but we deem it unnecessary to discuss these questions because of the factual condition which is disclosed by the record. The suit was by the widow of a gentleman who was killed as the result of a Pierce-Arrow automobile coming into collision with the rear end of a Ford truck on Dixie Highway in the early morning before daylight. The driver of the a
More

I agree to the conclusion. I do not regard discussion of the charges as necessary, as the same would not affect the result even if they were erroneous, and the discussion may lead to some confusion.

*Page 1

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer