Wernokoff v. State, (1935)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 8
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Attorneys: Harry P. Johnson and T.G. Futch, for Plaintiff in Error;
Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.
Filed: Oct. 01, 1935
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Leo Wernokoff was indicted for the armed robbery of one F.P. Schargus, the indictment charging *Page 63 defendant with taking from Schargus $10.00 in money and a hundred and seven (107) boxes of oranges, valued at a dollar a box. Upon trial he was found guilty, and from the judgment of conviction and sentence which followed he took writ of error. On the trial the State produced three witnesses, viz.: F.P. Schargus, Mrs. Eva Pate, and A.M. Davis. Davis, who operated the packing plant at Groveland
Summary: Leo Wernokoff was indicted for the armed robbery of one F.P. Schargus, the indictment charging *Page 63 defendant with taking from Schargus $10.00 in money and a hundred and seven (107) boxes of oranges, valued at a dollar a box. Upon trial he was found guilty, and from the judgment of conviction and sentence which followed he took writ of error. On the trial the State produced three witnesses, viz.: F.P. Schargus, Mrs. Eva Pate, and A.M. Davis. Davis, who operated the packing plant at Groveland,..
More
I do not think the record reveals any reversible error. I think the evidence was amply sufficient to warrant the jury in returning a verdict of guilty and that the judgment should be affirmed.
Source: CourtListener
