Smith v. Lindsay, (1938)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 11
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Attorneys: Worley Gautier and S. Whitehurst's Sons, for Appellants;
Edward L. Semple, for Appellee.
Filed: Jun. 17, 1938
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: In this case the only question necessary for us to determine is whether or not the Chancellor committed error in entering a final decree in favor of the Complainant for the face amount of municipal tax certificates where the record shows that such certificates were acquired by the complainant from the municipality for less than one-third of the amount of the face of such certificates. Under the pleadings as shown in the record presented here we hold that the complainant was entitled to a decree
Summary: In this case the only question necessary for us to determine is whether or not the Chancellor committed error in entering a final decree in favor of the Complainant for the face amount of municipal tax certificates where the record shows that such certificates were acquired by the complainant from the municipality for less than one-third of the amount of the face of such certificates. Under the pleadings as shown in the record presented here we hold that the complainant was entitled to a decree o..
More
I think the extraordinary petition sets up some serious questions which makes it advisable to grant rehearing as prayed, so that these questions can be fully argued and considered by the Court.
Source: CourtListener
