Judges: BUFORD, J.:
Attorneys: Horton Strahan, for appellant.
Kurtz, Reed, Sappenfield Cooper, for appellees.
Filed: Dec. 16, 1941
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 87 On July 17, 1940, appellant Goodwin exhibited his bill of complaint in the Circuit Court in and for Dade Couty, Florida, seeking to enforce a lien under the doctrine of subrogation against lot 6, Block 24 of Normandy Beach, second amended, according to a plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 16 on page 44 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. The bil
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 87 On July 17, 1940, appellant Goodwin exhibited his bill of complaint in the Circuit Court in and for Dade Couty, Florida, seeking to enforce a lien under the doctrine of subrogation against lot 6, Block 24 of Normandy Beach, second amended, according to a plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 16 on page 44 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. The bill..
More
While the holding in Boley v. Daniel, 72 Fla. 121,72 So. 644, cited in the foregoing opinion, was later modified to some extent in Federal Land Bank v. Godwin, 107 Fla. 537,136 So. 513, 145 So. 883, and
Federal Land Bank v. Dekle, 108 Fla. 555, 148 So. 756, at least as applied to the facts in those cases. I think the paragraphs above quoted from Boley v. Daniel are still a correct statement of the general principles involved and are not changed by our subsequent cases.
