Willis v. Van Woy, (1945)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 4
Judges: CHAPMAN, C. J.:
Attorneys: Milam, McIlvaine Milam and E.T. McIlvaine, for appellant.
Alley, Drew, Burns Middleton and R.C. Alley, for appellees.
Filed: Jan. 16, 1945
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: On a former appeal the sufficiency of a second amended bill of complaint in the case at bar was sustained as against a motion to dismiss on various grounds. See Van Woy v. Willis, 153 Fla. 189 , 14 So. 2d 185 . On the going down of the mandate an answer thereto was filed by Pierre L. Willis. Evidence on the issues made by the pleadings was taken by the respective parties and on final hearing the equities of the cause were found to be with the plaintiff below, and a final decree was entered accor
Summary: On a former appeal the sufficiency of a second amended bill of complaint in the case at bar was sustained as against a motion to dismiss on various grounds. See Van Woy v. Willis, 153 Fla. 189 , 14 So. 2d 185 . On the going down of the mandate an answer thereto was filed by Pierre L. Willis. Evidence on the issues made by the pleadings was taken by the respective parties and on final hearing the equities of the cause were found to be with the plaintiff below, and a final decree was entered accord..
More
I think the rehearing should be granted.
ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
Source: CourtListener
