Miracle v. Kriens, (1948)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 14
Judges: SEBRING, J.:
Attorneys: Evan T. Evans and P. Guy Crews, for appellants.
John T. Teate, for appellee.
Filed: Jan. 16, 1948
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: C. A. Miracle and C. A. Miracle, Jr., as copartners, were the owners of a combination cocktail lounge and barroom known as Mac's Bar Liquor Store, operated for the entertainment and pleasure of white patrons only. They had in their employ one Dorsey, who is admitted by the pleadings to have been acting within the scope of his employment in regard to the matters hereinafter narrated. The barroom was separated from the cocktail lounge by a partition wall running through the center of the building
Summary: C. A. Miracle and C. A. Miracle, Jr., as copartners, were the owners of a combination cocktail lounge and barroom known as Mac's Bar Liquor Store, operated for the entertainment and pleasure of white patrons only. They had in their employ one Dorsey, who is admitted by the pleadings to have been acting within the scope of his employment in regard to the matters hereinafter narrated. The barroom was separated from the cocktail lounge by a partition wall running through the center of the building f..
More
I think the question of weight and credibility of evidence was for jury. I think Mrs. Kriens testimony made a case for recovery.
BARNS, J., concurs.
Source: CourtListener
