Judges: THOMAS, Justice.
Attorneys: Wm. C. Pierce, of Tampa, for appellant.
Andrews Patterson, of Orlando, for appellees.
Filed: May 06, 1949
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Certiorari proceedings by Mrs. Nancy C. New and others against Nathan Mayo, as Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, to review an order of the Commissioner of Agriculture made pursuant to proceedings held under F.S.A. §§ 596.13, 596.14. From an adverse judgment, Nathan Mayo, as Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, appeals. Affirmed in part, reversed in part. This case is similar to the one titled Mayo v. Market Fruit Company, Fla., 40 So. 2d 555 . The difference in
Summary: Certiorari proceedings by Mrs. Nancy C. New and others against Nathan Mayo, as Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, to review an order of the Commissioner of Agriculture made pursuant to proceedings held under F.S.A. §§ 596.13, 596.14. From an adverse judgment, Nathan Mayo, as Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, appeals. Affirmed in part, reversed in part. This case is similar to the one titled Mayo v. Market Fruit Company, Fla., 40 So. 2d 555 . The difference in ..
More
I dissent because the Commissioner has proceeded against the appellees, Mrs. Nancy C. New et al., only under Section 596.13, F.S. 1941, F.S.A. The appellees have not been given a hearing upon proceedings brought against them for the purpose of forfeiting, suspending or revoking their license. Proceedings had pursuant to Section 596.13, supra, were not for such purpose.
