Roosevelt v. Karst, (1949)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 1
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Attorneys: C. Arthur Yergey, Orlando, for appellants.
Pringle Pringle, Leesburg, for appellee.
Filed: Sep. 16, 1949
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Affirmed. ADAMS, C.J., and CHAPMAN, SEBRING and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
On Rehearing
Pursuant to an order granting a rehearing, the court has reconsidered the case and, being now fully advised in the premises, it is our conclusion that we should adhere to our former opinion and judgment entered herein.
It is so ordered.
ADAMS, C.J., and CHAPMAN, SEBRING and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
Source: CourtListener
