Filed: Jun. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED WILLIAM D. CALLOWAY, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D15-2044 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed June 17, 2016 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, William G. Law, Jr, Judge. William D. Calloway, South Bay, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beac
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED WILLIAM D. CALLOWAY, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D15-2044 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed June 17, 2016 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, William G. Law, Jr, Judge. William D. Calloway, South Bay, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
WILLIAM D. CALLOWAY,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D15-2044
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed June 17, 2016
Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Lake County,
William G. Law, Jr, Judge.
William D. Calloway, South Bay, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire,
Assistant Attorney General, Daytona
Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s order precluding William Calloway from future pro se
filings. However, because it appears Calloway may now have a valid claim, namely that
the 100 year sentence imposed on him as a juvenile constitutes an unconstitutional de
facto life sentence, see Miller v. Alabama,
132 S. Ct. 2455, 2469 (2012) and Falcon v.
State,
162 So. 3d 954, 964 (Fla. 2015), we do so without prejudice to Calloway’s ability
to file with the trial court a motion for the appointment of counsel to represent him on that
claim.1
AFFIRMED.
TORPY, BERGER and LAMBERT, concur.
1
Calloway argues in his brief that he sought the appointment of counsel to
represent him on his most recent postconviction filing, but that the request was denied.
We can find nothing in the record to suggest that such a motion was ever filed.
2