MORINE v. CITY OF MARCO ISLAND, 2:11-CV-175-FtM-29SPC. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120510957
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 09, 2012
Latest Update: May 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Redact Exhibit in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #30) filed on May 7, 2012. Defendants request that the Court accept a redacted copy of Exhibit L to their Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #28) because due to a clerical error the unredacted version was filed. The Court notes upon review of the exhibits to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, that counsel file
Summary: ORDER SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Redact Exhibit in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #30) filed on May 7, 2012. Defendants request that the Court accept a redacted copy of Exhibit L to their Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #28) because due to a clerical error the unredacted version was filed. The Court notes upon review of the exhibits to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, that counsel filed..
More
ORDER
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Redact Exhibit in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #30) filed on May 7, 2012. Defendants request that the Court accept a redacted copy of Exhibit L to their Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #28) because due to a clerical error the unredacted version was filed. The Court notes upon review of the exhibits to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, that counsel filed the exhibits, which total 106 pages, as one attachment to their Motion for Summary Judgment in CM/ECF. The Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing of this Court, which are available at www.flmd.uscourts.gov, state that "each separate exhibit must be filed as a separate attachment to the main document." Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal Cases, Sec. IV(B)(2). Accordingly, the Court will direct defense counsel to re-file the exhibits to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment in CM/ECF as separate attachments. When counsel does so, a redacted version of Exhibit L may be included.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
(1) Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Redact Exhibit in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #30) is GRANTED. Counsel for Defendant is directed to re-file the exhibits to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment in CM/ECF as separate attachments in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing of this Court. When counsel does so, a redacted version of Exhibit L may be included.
(2) The Clerk of Court is directed to remove the exhibits attached to Document 28 (Doc. #28-1) from CM/ECF, as they will be re-filed by Defendant.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
