Filed: Apr. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 21, 2014
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. STEELE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #44), filed March 21, 2014, recommending that the Second Renewed Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement (Doc. #43) be granted, the attached Settlement Agreement be approved, and the case dismissed. The parties filed a Notice of Non Objection to Report and Recommendation (Doc. #45) on April 21, 2014. After conducting a careful
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. STEELE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #44), filed March 21, 2014, recommending that the Second Renewed Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement (Doc. #43) be granted, the attached Settlement Agreement be approved, and the case dismissed. The parties filed a Notice of Non Objection to Report and Recommendation (Doc. #45) on April 21, 2014. After conducting a careful a..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN E. STEELE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #44), filed March 21, 2014, recommending that the Second Renewed Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement (Doc. #43) be granted, the attached Settlement Agreement be approved, and the case dismissed. The parties filed a Notice of Non Objection to Report and Recommendation (Doc. #45) on April 21, 2014.
After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F.Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).
After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #44) is hereby adopted and the findings incorporated herein.
2. The parties' Second Renewed Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement and Entry of an Order of Dismissal (Doc. #43) is GRANTED and the Settlement Agreement (Doc. #43-1) is approved as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute.
3. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case, terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and close the file.
DONE and ORDERED.
