Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ARCHER WESTERN CONTRACTORS, LLC v. LEE COUNTY, 2:14-cv-469-FtM-38CM. (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20141217a88 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 16, 2014
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERIPOLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Archer Western Contractors, LLC's Notice of Filing Joint Proposed Order ( Doc. #45 ) filed on December 15, 2014. The undersigned held a Preliminary Pretrial Conference on December 1, 2014 (Doc. #39), at which time the parties discussed the disclosure of privileged materials during this case. The Court instructed the parties to file a joint proposed order on the matter. Consequently, the parties have s
More

ORDER1

SHERIPOLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Archer Western Contractors, LLC's Notice of Filing Joint Proposed Order (Doc. #45) filed on December 15, 2014. The undersigned held a Preliminary Pretrial Conference on December 1, 2014 (Doc. #39), at which time the parties discussed the disclosure of privileged materials during this case. The Court instructed the parties to file a joint proposed order on the matter. Consequently, the parties have submitted to a Joint Proposed Order that outlines their agreement on matters related to Rule 502(d) of the Federal Rules of Evidence for the Court's approval. (Doc. #45 at 3-7).

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

Plaintiff Archer Western Contractors, LLC's Notice of Filing of Joint Proposed Order (Doc. #45) is GRANTED. The Court will issue an Order on the disclosure of the privileged material pursuant to Rule 502(d) of the Federal Rules of Evidence under separate cover.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer