U.S. v. AGUILAR, 8:11-CR-345-T-17-EAJ. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150903941
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH , District Judge . This cause comes before the Court on the defendant's motion for reduction of sentence, the requested modification was based on the retroactive application of revised cocaine base sentencing guidelines (Doc. 540) filed by retained counsel. The Court also has before it the U.S. Probation Office Amendment Assessment (Doc. 545) and the government's response to the motion for reduction (Doc. 554). The Court has reviewed the motion, the Amended A
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH , District Judge . This cause comes before the Court on the defendant's motion for reduction of sentence, the requested modification was based on the retroactive application of revised cocaine base sentencing guidelines (Doc. 540) filed by retained counsel. The Court also has before it the U.S. Probation Office Amendment Assessment (Doc. 545) and the government's response to the motion for reduction (Doc. 554). The Court has reviewed the motion, the Amended As..
More
ORDER
ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on the defendant's motion for reduction of sentence, the requested modification was based on the retroactive application of revised cocaine base sentencing guidelines (Doc. 540) filed by retained counsel. The Court also has before it the U.S. Probation Office Amendment Assessment (Doc. 545) and the government's response to the motion for reduction (Doc. 554). The Court has reviewed the motion, the Amended Assessment for the United States Probation Office, and the response to the motion by the government. The Court concludes that the defendant is not eligible for a reduction in sentence based on the amended guidelines and adopts the position of the Probation Office and the government that the total offense level of the defendant remains the same and there is no basis on which the Court can reduce the sentence of this defendant. Accordingly, it is.
ORDERED that defendant's motion for modification of sentence be denied.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
