Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HANCOCK SHOPPES, LLC v. RETAINED SUBSIDIARY ONE, LLC, 2:17-cv-364-FtM-99MRM. (2017)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20170725922 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 24, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2017
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Retained Subsidiary One, LLC's Unopposed Second Motion for Leave to Amended Notice of Removal. (Doc. 47). Retained Subsidiary seeks to amend its Notice of Removal to (1) include additional information about the citizenship for each member holding an interest in the limited liability company; and (2) outline the transactions whereby Defendant Kash n' Karry Food Stores, Inc. was dis
More

OPINION AND ORDER1

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Retained Subsidiary One, LLC's Unopposed Second Motion for Leave to Amended Notice of Removal. (Doc. 47). Retained Subsidiary seeks to amend its Notice of Removal to (1) include additional information about the citizenship for each member holding an interest in the limited liability company; and (2) outline the transactions whereby Defendant Kash n' Karry Food Stores, Inc. was dissolved. (Doc. 47; Doc. 47-1). Retained Subsidiary has attached its proposed Amended Notice of Removal. (Doc. 47-1). In addition, Plaintiff Hancock Shoppes, LLC has agreed to withdraw its Motion for Remand (Doc. 11) with the filing of the Amended Notice of Removal.

Upon review of the proposed Amended Notice of Removal, and because Retained Subsidiary's motion is unopposed, the Court finds good cause to grant the requested relief.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) Defendant Retained Subsidiary One, LLC's Unopposed Second Motion for Leave to Amend Notice of Removal (Doc. 47) is GRANTED. (2) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to file the Amended Notice of Removal (Doc. 47-1) as a new docket entry.

(3) Plaintiff Hancock Shoppes, LLC's Motion to Remand (Doc. 11) is DENIED as moot.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer