Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gwinnett v. Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, 2:19-cv-295-FtM-38MRM. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20191010930 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 29) to the Court's Order to Show Cause (Doc. 28). Last month, the Court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss, dismissed the Complaint (Doc. 1) without prejudice, and allowed Plaintiff to replead by filing an amended complaint. (Doc. 25 at 12). Plaintiff never did so, and the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed. (Doc. 28). Plaintiff responded, explaining
More

ORDER1

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 29) to the Court's Order to Show Cause (Doc. 28). Last month, the Court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss, dismissed the Complaint (Doc. 1) without prejudice, and allowed Plaintiff to replead by filing an amended complaint. (Doc. 25 at 12). Plaintiff never did so, and the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed. (Doc. 28). Plaintiff responded, explaining that she "elected not to file an amended complaint." (Doc. 29 at 1-2). Instead, Plaintiff intends to appeal the Court's Order (Doc. 25) dismissing the Complaint. (Doc. 29 at 2). Thus, the case is dismissed.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The case is DISMISSED. 2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate any pending motions or deadlines, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer