Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

FARMER v. TUCKER, 3:09cv529/MCR/EMT. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20120229952 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated December 16, 2011 (doc. 38). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objecti
More

ORDER

M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated December 16, 2011 (doc. 38). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer